header2015a

ctmobile2015

01223 833555

Engineers Notes

Welcome to the Engineers Notes. A blog from Charles Tallack detailing, news, projects and information relating to structural engineering. We'd love you to sign up.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Team Blogs
    Team Blogs Find your favorite team blogs here.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Posted by on in Engineers Notes

 

A "knock-through" is the term for removing an internal wall in a building to connect two room spaces or create an open-plan area. It is one of the humblest aspects of the Structural Engineer's work, but none the less important for that.

We've often come across walls which have been re-pointed in cement mortar and suffered erosion of the masonry units (bricks or stone blocks) as a result. I witnessed a particularly severe example on a church wall last week, which prompted me to write this article.

In short: if your wall was originally built with lime mortar, then it should only be re-pointed in lime mortar! Not cement mortar, not mortar with bagged lime and a bit of cement just to help it, just proper lime mortar.

Since Roman times, lime and sand were the principal ingredients for mortar, and only since the 1930s has cement mortar been widely used. The convenience and strength of cement has led to it being used for re-pointing old masonry; however its strength and water resistance is detrimental to the longevity of the wall.

What happens is that the moisture that lands on the outer face of the wall gets trapped on and behind the cement mortar, and cannot evaporate from the surface as it would with permeable lime mortar. The next frost causes this moisture to expand and the face of the brick or stone will spall away, eroding the wall on each occasion. In the example of a church wall, the soft clunch (chalk) and slightly harder limestone have been eaten away to a depth of 50-80mm and the localised action of the re-pointing is very evident. This is coupled with the slightly acidic nature of rainwater, which will dissolve the alkaline stone.

So, if your wall is more than 70 years old and needs re-pointing, you should not use any cement in your mortar. Use one part lime putty (not bagged lime) to three parts sharp sand (not masonry sand, or soft sand). For conservation-grade work, the sand should match that originally used, which may mean it is quarried locally to get the correct constituents and colouration.

If your wall has already been re-pointed, you can usually tell if cement mortar has been used as it is greyer in colour and the sand may lack the gritty particles found in sharp sand (although sometimes sharp sand will have been used). Cement mortar is harder and brittle, so it will resist scratching with a screwdriver or key, whereas lime mortar can be dug out more easily.

If the re-pointing has caused serious damage to your wall it may be worth having it examined to assess whether removing the offending material is worthwhile, but as the removal process can cause further damage to the masonry, it is best in most cases to leave it as-is.

For advice on particular cases, please contact us on engineering@charlestallack.co.uk  

We were delighted to celebrate our tenth anniversary on 1st October 2013 - in this time we have worked hard, learned a great deal, and shared our clients' anxieties and satisfaction as each project proceeds to completion.

We're looking forward to the next ten years (and more) of helping people enjoy the spaces in which they live and work, and the reason is- because we love what we do!

Engineers Notes

  • a
  • b
  • c
  • d
  • e
  • f
  • g